Comparo: 2012 Buick Regal GS vs. Acura TSX V6
Story and photos by John LeBlanc The idea of comparing any Acura against any Buick may seem laughable. Stereotypes would have you believe that Buicks are luxury-first floatmobiles, designed for your Great Aunt to get to church on Sunday with no fuss. Acura, on the other hand, is Honda's attempt at taking on more sporting rides from Europe. Yet in a surprising role-reversal, the Japanese TSX and American Regal sedans are more alike than you may think. In Europe — a continent this pair of midsize family sedans were designed for — the TSX is sold as a Honda Accord, while the Regal wears Opel Insignia branding. Here in Canada, though, both are sold in the ultra-competitive, entry-level luxury sport sedan segment, a class virtually invented by the BMW 3 Series in the 1980s. But unlike the BMW, the Buick and Acura are front-wheel-drive only, even in top-spec trim. Our Acura is powered by a Buick-sounding 3.5-litre V6, while the Buick gets a distinctively Japanese-sounding 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo. But can either cut it as a true driver's car?Second place: 2012 Acura TSX V6 Tech
When it was introduced for 2004, the original TSX quickly gained a reputation among enthusiasts as a driver's car. Despite being front-wheel drive, the Americanized European Accord came with a free-revving four-cylinder, a slick-shifting six-speed manual that felt like it came directly from Honda's S2000 sports car, and a suspension setup that favoured nimble cornering over coddling passengers. Then Acura started chasing luxury-first buyers. In 2010, the car entered its second generation. It grew bigger, softer, and unfortunately, fatter. While that four-cylinder and manual combination is still available (at a completely agreeable $31,890, no less), it's the range-topping V6 Tech that shows the car's true colours. It packs the same V6 engine and five-speed automatic as the midsize TL. The TSX V6 Tech comes only one way: loaded. Where it would cost more to get the same level of equipment in the Buick, such luxuries as navigation and a power sunroof are standard kit in the Acura. (Note: a last-minute photoshoot meant a swap for a four-cylinder model.) The TSX is also more luxurious than the Regal inside, with richer-feeling materials and tighter fit and finish throughout. Occupants get a comfortable cockpit with an excellent driving position. The Acura's controls are also easier to operate than the Buick's, despite looking more complex. In another unexpected bit of role reversal, the Acura's exterior is more conservative than the Buick. Except for bigger wheels and tires, there's little to distinguish four- and six-cylinder TSXs. Despite offering two more cylinders and 1.5 additional litres of displacement, the TSX's six-cylinder offers only a little more horsepower: 280 compared to the Buick's 270. Both these sedans go from rest to 100 km/h just under seven seconds. But the numbers don't quite tell the story: the Acura doesn't feel as brisk off the line. With only 252 lb.-ft., the TSX V6 Tech doesn't get off the mark as quickly as the Regal GS with its 295 lb.-ft. And while the Regal GS can be had with a six-speed manual, the TSX V6 Tech comes solely with a five-speed automatic. At least there are steering wheel-mounted paddle shifters with the Acura. When it comes to ride and handling, once again, luxury sedan fans will be pleased with the TSX. It is very smooth and composed — especially over frost-heaved Canadian roads. But sports sedan fans will be disappointed. Compared to the original TSX's hydraulic system, the current car's electric setup is numb and less communicative. Add to that additional weight over the nose from the bigger engine (62 per cent front, 38 per cent rear), and the TSX understeers easily when pushed. Soft springs also make for more body roll in the corners. All you have to do is re-read that last sentence to see why we chose the Buick. Buy this car if ... you want plenty of luxury goodies at a reasonable price; like a well-designed interior; you desire conservative styling and driving characteristics. Don't buy this car if ... you feel the need to be connected to road; want to show your neighbours you're the sporty type.First place: 2012 Buick Regal GS
If you're old enough, you may remember the original Buick GS models from the 1960s. A reaction to the Pontiac LeMans-based G.T.O., it was a midsize car with a full-size motor under the hood with the express purpose of going very quickly in a straight line. The new-for-2012 Regal GS is the polar opposite: it has a downsized motor, and while it's quick in a straight line, it's also surprisingly brisk in the twisties thanks to its European roots. A bit shorter in wheelbase than the Buick LaCrosse it shares platforms with, the Regal sports an all-four-cylinder lineup. The $30,085 base model gets a 182-hp 2.4L naturally aspirated engine. Throw another $10,000 onto the table, and you can walk off with a Regal GS, which offers a no-cost-extra six-speed automatic transmission. You will have to pay for summer performance 20-inch rubber (and the shiny chrome alloys they were mounted on), though. Summer performance tires? Optional automatic? Buick? Yeah. That's right. What does come standard is sporty looks. Even in non-GS form, the Buick sedan has an aggressive stance that fans of Chris Bangle-designed BMWs will appreciate. The GS trim only adds to the visual excitement, with vertical air vents up front and a subtle rear spoiler out back. If not as well-screwed-together as the TSX, the Regal GS's sport seats do a better job keeping drivers in the proper position. But the Buick suffers from several interior design disappointments. Firstly, the centre stack is not intuitive — it has multiple iDrive-style knobs to control a variety of functions. Its navigation system is hard to navigate through, too. And what's with the silver inserts on the steering wheel? They look and feel cheap. For luxury sport sedan owners that like to drive, though, the Regal GS is a hoot. Even when equipped with our tester's autobox, the Buick feels like it's always anxious to get a move on. The Regal GS's structure feels rock solid, with nary a jiggle or rattle to be felt or heard, an even more impressive sign given the low-profile rubber. Buick's Drive Control System can customize the level of steering assist, throttle response and suspension tautness three ways: Normal, Sport and GS. Even at its most aggressive tune, the Buick never delivers a brittle ride, although it is notably firmer than the Acura. The turbo four also makes more noise than the Acura's softer, smoother six. The Buick's hydraulically boosted variable-effort steering communicates more readily than the near-silent Acura setup. There's certainly more weight at the Buick's helm when you initially turn off-centre. And when cornering hard, the Regal GS doesn't lean as much as the TSX V6 Tech, while the Buick's rear-end tends to play follow-the-leader with the car's front-end for a balanced handling act. Keep in mind: these comments are with the autobox iteration. A manual transmission Regal GS may fulfill your luxury sport sedan expectations even further. Maybe it's time to re-think Buick after all ... Buy this car if ... you enjoy the act of driving; don't mind driving a good-looking sports sedan. Don't buy this car if ... you mind paying extra for luxury features; you appreciate straightforward ergonomics; you want a relaxing driving experience.11.05.12 | 2012, Acura, Buick, Car Buying Advice, comparos | Comments Off on Comparo: 2012 Buick Regal GS vs. Acura TSX V6