Little Tatas, huge hype
January 30, 2008 - By John LeBlanc
The Detroit auto show wrapped up just last weekend, but the auto industry is still buzzing about a car that was introduced the same week, albeit 11,881 kilometres away at the New Delhi Auto Expo in India.
It’s called the Tata Nano. And no, it’s not an Apple iPod knockoff, it’s more like a five-passenger micro car (61 cm shorter than a Mini Cooper) with a $2,500 (U.S.) price tag — about $10,000 less than the cheapest new car sold in Canada, Chevrolet’s Aveo.
There are no official figures, but the tiny Tata’s drivetrain is shockingly similar to last year’s $16,700 Smart ForTwo: rear-wheel-drive, 623-cubic-centimetre engine, 35 horsepower, and a top speed of 120 km/h.
As you’d expect, the Nano’s paucity of features makes the Aveo look like a Roll-Royce Phantom. Radio, airbags, and a passenger-side mirror are all options. And if you want air conditioning to survive India's 45 C summers, you will need to pay more.
The fact no Western journalists have either sat in or driven the Nano hasn’t prevented the publishing of hyperbole or wild assumptions about the car.
Optimists gleefully crow that the Nano will “revolutionize the auto industry,” and do for India's expanding middle classes what the Volkswagen Beetle and the Mini did to “democratize motoring” in Europe after the Second World War.
Time magazine threw any credibility it had under the bus by prematurely crowning the Nano as one of the 12 most important cars of all time, right alongside legendary cars like the Model T, Beetle, Chevrolet Bel Air, Toyota Corolla, Mini and Honda Civic.
Even before Ratan Tata, chair of Tata Motors, drove the car onstage to “spontaneous” applause during the car’s reveal, Nano naysayers accuse it of leading to millions more automobiles hitting clogged Indian roads, adding to the already regrettable air and noise pollution.
Outside, Greenpeace activists held up banners calling for the world to tackle climate change and "Cut CO2'' rather than build millions of ever-cheaper cars. Even the chief climate scientists for the United Nations, Rajendra Pachauri, said last month that he was “having nightmares" about the prospect of the Nano.
Currently, only about 12 in 1,000 Indians have a car, according to the UN (in the U.S., the ratio is 765 to 1,000.) Already, 1,000 new cars enter the streets of the capital New Delhi every day.
Critics like Pachauri are fretting that if the world's second most populous nation’s rapid economic growth pushes its car-ownership ratio to that of the U.S., that would put 864 million cars on India's roads, more than three-and-one-half times the figure in the U.S.
One of the reasons the little Tata received more attention than any of the reveals at the Detroit show is the car’s potential threat to the Western autoworld’s status quo.
If the Nano ends up the success that some analysts are predicting, it will have one-upped Western automakers such as General Motors, Ford, Toyota, VW, Mitsubishi and Renault-Nissan, which are looking for sales growth in Asia, Africa and Latin America at a time when the European and American markets are flatter than a Saskatchewan ski hill.
Whether one is for a $2,500 People’s Car, or against it, predicting whether is will be successful is a fool’s game. The world we live in — where economic, political, and social variables impact us on a global scale — has more opportunity for change than ever before.
So let’s give the current maelstrom of Nano news a reality check.
For one, Tata says it can only produce 250,000 Nanos a year — max. Even then, its social acceptance into the traditional Indian culture is no slam dunk. And as far as selling outside of India, the automaker says it’s at least two to three years away before exporting to other emerging markets in Africa and Latin America.
Second, no one can argue the urgency to develop new alternatives to the internal combustion engine or the burning of fossil fuels.
But Western environmentalists pooh-poohing the Indians’ right to enjoy the status and freedom that comes with not walking or riding a donkey smacks of convenience, colonialism, or hypocrisy — or all of the above.
The marketplace will take care of both the optimists and pessimists: If
all of these cars flow into emerging markets like India and China, the
price of gas will undoubtedly get to the point that even filling the
tank on a $2,500 Nano will become too expensive.
the Crank 107: Au revoir, ecoAUTO...
the Crank 106: Wagons ho!
the Crank 105: Show Wars
the Crank 104:
Neutered muscle car, or the best of both worlds?
the Crank 103:
Little Tatas, huge hype
the Crank 102:
The mouse speaks
the Crank 101:
Future shock
the Crank 100:
Looking for change in Detroit
this year?
the Crank #99:
'Tis the season...
the Crank #98:
35 MPG, or bust!
the Crank #97:
Knightrider gets a pony
the Crank #96:
Depreciation: The silent killer
the Crank #95:
The Best American car ever?
the Crank #94:
L.A. versus Detroit—Highlights at 11
the Crank #93:
Update: Cross-border shopping
the Crank #92:
Is the reborn, rear-drive Impala dead?
the Crank #91: Are car makers blind?
the Crank #90:
Cross-border car shopping
the Crank #89:
Subaru's doin' diesels & Toyota's troubles with Tundra
the Crank #88:
Just what we need, more brands
the Crank #87:
Is Honda's new CR-Z doomed?
the Crank #86:
Women on women on cars
the Crank #85:
Ford's furious Focus fixes
the Crank #84:
At VW, which way is up?
the Crank #83:
Frankfurt 2007 -
Making sense of the chaos
the Crank #82:
Frankfurt 2007 -
Vive la difference!
the Crank #81:
Fool me thrice
the Crank #80:
There are knowns...
the Crank #79:
Import vs. Domestic—Who cares?
the Crank #78:
New Impreza's confounding looks
the Crank #77:
Walmart Wheels
the Crank #76:
Chrysler's close call
the Crank #75:
Hybrids losing steam
the Crank #74:
Chinese fireworks
the Crank #73:
Conceptually speaking...
the Crank #72:
If a Lincoln starts every time, does anyone care?
The Crank #71:
Why Kubica's crash was a no brainer
The Crank #70:
Kia's getting faster, maybe even more furious, too
the CRANK #69:
The New Chrysler:Now what?
the CRANK #68:
Is the retro Nitro a detour?
the CRANK #67:
Cheap gas is killing the planet
the Crank #66:
Youze either go big—or fuhgeddaboutit!—in the Big Apple
the Crank #65:
Detroit 2007: Hits & Misses…
the CRANK #64:
Au revoir, JV?
the CRANK #63:
Diesel destiny
the CRANK #62:
That '70s Car Company
the CRANK #61:
Idiots in Porsches, no more
the CRANK #60:
If you love somebody,
set them free
the CRANK #59:
RSX, R.I.P.
the CRANK #58:
Kia's Power of Hype
the CRANK #57:
Smaller Saturn sunk
the CRANK #56:
Dammit, I want that Super Licence!
the CRANK #55:
Brand Bastards II
the CRANK #54:
Sanity, lunacy and death
the CRANK #53:
Invisible Cars
the CRANK #52:
How did Smart get so dumb?
the CRANK #51:
It's not the country, it's the car
the CRANK #50:
It ain't easy being green.
the CRANK #49:
Challenger, Camaro: Build or bust?
the CRANK #48:
The General's Adult Playground
the CRANK #47:
Lotus blooms in Canada
the CRANK #46:
2005: The Underdogs
the CRANK #45:
The Top Three for Oh-Five
the CRANK #44:
This just in: Styling sells cars...
the CRANK #43:
Welcome to Planet Toyota
the CRANK #42:
Spied: The new Volkswagen Fez
The CRANK #41:
There’s new, and then there’s the best
the CRANK #40:
You can cancel that Monster Zed order...
the CRANK #39 -
Can Audi make 10 go into 3?
the CRANK #38 -
The SRT gang strike again
the CRANK #37 -
Monkey SEMA, monkey do
the CRANK #36 -
Mmm, mmm, Five!
the CRANK #35 -
I get a Hummer
the CRANK #34:
It’s the product, stupid!
the CRANK #33 -
Stiff, or Stanfield?
the CRANK #32 -
Bricklin's Back, sort of...
the CRANK #31 -
The General's Naming Games
the CRANK #30-
What was hot, and not, in 2004
the CRANK #29 -
2005 Canadian Car of the Year – NOT!
the CRANK #28 -
The air is certainly different on Planet Saturn
the CRANK #27 -
Unrequited love
the CRANK #26 -
Why Acura has it backwards
the CRANK #25 -
Bringing up the rear
the CRANK #24 -
An American Revolution in badging only
the CRANK #23 -
Rookie Review
the CRANK #22 -
Detroit's short term sales gain is turning into a long term brand pain
the CRANK #21 -
How do you like your Japanese meatballs?"
the CRANK #20 -
Our "car of the year", "ten best", "all-star" blow out
the CRANK #19 -
Psycho-Brits, qu'est-ce que?
the CRANK #18 -
An old ice racer learns new tricks
the CRANK #17 -
The Answer Man responds to your burning questions
the CRANK #16 -
Mercedes Benz E Class: A Driving Odyssey
the CRANK #15 -
Trading in Pontiac's spear for Alfa Romeo's shield
the CRANK #14 -
For the love of driving
the CRANK #13 -
Hey, MG Rover, don't bother coming over
the CRANK #12 -
The Death of the American Car
the CRANK #11 -
Brand Bastards
the CRANK #10-
Dude, where's my Vibe?
the CRANK #09 -
Bigger Door Beams Versus Better Drivers
the CRANK #07 -
Herr Piech proves that after V comes W
the CRANK #06 -
Robert & Me
the CRANK #05 -
No humbug here, I love Speedvision
the CRANK #04 -
Zero-percent financing plus zero sales = big trouble

